WHY I’M OBSESSED WITH MAKING A MURDERER

 

MAKING A MURDERER – REMAKING HISTORY?

If you binge-listened to the Serial Podcast and have been tentatively waiting for a replacement, then the new Netflix documentary Making a Murderer will have you sleuthing and screaming at the television before long. Netflix has infiltrated the pop culture lexicon like no other streaming website, determining what we watch, what we talk about and now, what we care about. Making a Murderer, the story of the trial of Steven Avery for the murder of Teresa Halbach has fully infiltrated the consciousness of its audience, the first case since Graham Dwyer that has everyone in Ireland passionately debating the events in enraged tones. But unlike Dwyer’s case, the Steven Avery trial has attained its notoriety for another reason – the blatant disregard of the criminal justice system to assume innocence, until proven guilty.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS SHOW JURY INTIMIDATION

The producers of Making a Murderer, Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, just yesterday, announced via the Today Show , that a juror from Steven Avery’s 2005 trial had contacted them to say that he/she feared the repercussions of reaching a ‘not guilty’ verdict. This juror expressed fear of intimidation and violence from a third party, should any doubt be placed over the desired ‘guilty’ verdict and also expressed a willingness to testify, should Avery be granted a new trial. The overwhelming sense I had when watching the documentary, was that there was not enough physical, scientific evidence to incriminate Steven Avery or Brendan Dassey for the murder of Teresa Halbach. It seems very likely that the key of her car was planted in the Avery’s salvage yard. Yet, as we have seen, again and again, if you are of colour, poor or lacking in education, you are not afforded the same kind of justice that the middle-class white, educated male is. Steven Avery was poor, he lived in a trailer and possessed an IQ of 70 but criminal mastermind, capable of removing all traces of blood and DNA from his premises, he is not. Brendan Dassey had special educational needs, with the reading ability of a fourth grader at the age of 16. A confused, subdued, socially inept loner? Yes. A violent rapist, sadist and murder accomplice? Absolutely not.

KEY QUESTIONS TO ASK WHEN WATCHING MAKING A MURDERER

  1. Why was Brendan Dassey’s original testimony not thrown out of court, considering the level of suggestion and intimidation he faced from the police?
  2. Why wasn’t Brendan Dassey, a sixteen-year-old with an IQ of under 70, permitted to have an adult or attorney in the room with him while being questioned?
  3. Why was Steven Avery’s blood sample from the 1985 Penny Beernsten case tampered with?
  4. Why was there no blood on the premises if Teresa Halbach was allegedly shot on the Avery property?
  5. Why did Len Kachinsky and Michael O’Kelly collude with the prosecution to try to force a guilty plea from Brendan Dassey?
  6. Why was there no other line of enquiry pursued other than the lead that Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey were the main suspects?
  7. Why was the DNA cross contaminated with the testers own DNA and why wasn’t this thrown out as tampered-with evidence?
  8. Why did DA KenKatz say ‘so what if the key was planted?’
  9. Why did Steven Avery have the same judge for his appeals case?
  10. Why was Brendan Dassey convincted of sexual assault without any trace of his DNA in the trailer Teresa Halbach was supposedly killed or on the bone fragments of Teresa’s remains?

WHY MAKING A MURDERER CALLS FOR MAJOR REFORM

Steven Avery,who was wrongly convicted of rape and assault in the 80s and was proven innocent after 18 years of prison time is “a shining example of their [police] inadequacies, their misconduct” says the voice-over in the Netflix Making a Murderer trailer. Avery, who sought $36 million in compensation from the Manitowoc county was not, in my opinion, given a fair trial. From the level of media scrutiny and sensationalism surrounding the case, the jury can’t have avoided the common assumption that Steven Avery was a deviant individual with a vendetta against the government. However, the documentary has created a huge call-to-action with two online petitions (you can sign the change.org petition here) being created with the purpose of exonerating Steven Avery. Will the Netflix documentary spark a change in the American criminal justice system? Only time will tell. Is itcompelling, mind-bending viewing? Hell, yes.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s